"Rumor of Cannibals" by Dave D. Davis in "Archaeology" (January/February 1992, p. 49) One autumn morning in 1492, Christopher Columbus stood on a beach on Hispaniola, conversing with local Taino inhabitants. The Admiral's hosts informed him that small islands to the southeast (today's Lesser Antilles) were occupied by Caniba, or Canima (later Hispanicized to Caribes, and eventually Anglicized to Caribs). The Taino word Caniba means "manioc people" or "people of the manioc clan" and is the root word of both Caribbean and cannibal. But, according to the Taino, these Caniba were warlike eaters of human flesh who periodically raided the peaceful folk of the larger islands. Caribs were also associated with the underworld in the local mythology. The Admiral recorded other hearsay about these people. On November 4, 1492, in Cuba, he had learned that Caniba "had but one eye and the faces of dogs." Subsequent voyages and colonization of the West Indies revealed that the islands were populated by nothing more fantastic than two-legged, two-eyed, non-tailed Native Americans. Reviewing early documents related to the Island Caribs, anthropologist Robert Myers found a pattern of low-scale raiding and slave-taking throughout the Windward Islands, but there was no reliable evidence to support their reputation as cannibals. But the report of the ferocious Caniba continued to influence Spanish policy. It would seem that stories of Carib ferocity helped to resolve a conflict between the clergy's desire to save souls and Spanish colonists' need for labor. A 1511 edict defined as Caribs any Indians who were hostile to Europeans, behaved violently, or consumed human flesh. Caribs, the edict concluded, were without souls, and so were suitable subjects for the slave trade. Who were the inhabitants of the Lesser Antilles, the so- called Island Caribs? Father Raymond Breton, who spent several years among them during the second quarter of the seventeenth century, reported that the Island Caribs, who called themselves the Kalinago, employed both "men's" and "women's" languages. Breton's informants said this dual language system was the result of an invasion of the Lesser Antilles by Carib-speaking men from South America who took possession of the islands through raids upon their inhabitants, who spoke Arawak. The Caribs enslaved or killed the men and married the women. The men's language was supposedly derived from the Carib spoken by the invaders. Efforts to identity archaeological remains reflecting the presumed "Carib invasion" of the Lesser Antilles have been unsuccessful. In the 1960s, archaeologist Ripley Bullen of the University of Florida proposed a link between the Carib invasion and Suazey pottery, which appeared on islands from Martinique southward around A.D. 1100. However, Bullen's theory has been disputed by other investigators. Louis Allaire of the University of Alberta and Dutch archaeologist Arie Boomert have found similarities between ceramics in the Lesser Antilles and Guyana, but the documentation remains incomplete. The tale reported by Breton is not without problems, and the answer to the Island Carib's origins may lie in a different understanding of the historical and linguistic evidence. As linguists Berend Hoff, of the University of Leiden, and the late Douglas Taylor showed, the Island Carib men's language is in fact a pidgin--a tongue lacking a full lexicon and possessing a highly simplified grammar. If the Island Carib men's language was like most other pidgins, it more likely reflects peaceful interaction between South American Caribs and Arawaks living in the Lesser Antilles. This interpretation suggests that the Island Caribs were in fact of Arawak descent and not the successors of male invaders from the mainland. And whatever the true extent of cannibalism among these peoples, it clearly has been exaggerated. Notwithstanding the infamy of the Island Caribs, Breton apparently never observed an instance of cannibalism. In the broader context of Arawakan peoples in the West Indies, the Island Caribs may have been "black sheep" by reputation, but they were part of the same flock. Reprint permission granted by publisher.