|
|
|
|
Home
Forums Grades Pre K-2
Grades 3-5
Grades 6-8
Grades 9-12
Open
– Ended Template
Pat
Miller
Joanna
McIntyre
Karen Wallace
Patricia
Douglass
Grade Level: 3-5
|
Content
Area: Probability and Prediction |
Problem and Directions:
Jill
and Sam were playing a game against the computer. The computer gets the expected
probability. They used the spinner
pictured below:
|
|
Part A:
On the chart below, write in fraction form the expected probability for each number on the
spinner.
|
Number on Spinner |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Probability of Spinning this number |
|
|
|
|
|
Part B:
The
results of Jill’s spins were: 1,5,2,4,3,3,2,3.
The results of Sam’s spins were: 1,3,1,5,5,3,4,3.
Complete the chart below to show in fraction form the results of each
child’s spins.
|
Number on Spinner |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Jill’s
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
Sam’s
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
Part C:
Did Jill or Sam come closer to the computer’s
results? Explain your answer.
Part
A:
|
Number on Spinner |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Probability of Spinner |
1/8 |
3/8 |
2/8 |
1/8 |
1/8 |
Part B:
|
Number on Spinner |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Jill’s
Results |
1/8 |
2/8 |
3/8 |
1/8 |
1/8 |
|
Sam’s
Results |
2/8 |
0/8 |
3/8 |
1/8 |
2/8 |
Part C:
Jill came closer to the computer’s result. She matched the computer’s results for 3 numbers
– 1,4, and 5.
Sam matched the computer’s results for only 1 number – 4
Jill
came closer to the computer’s result.
She matched the computer’s result for 1, she was 1 off for 2, 1 off for
3, matched for 4 and matched for 5 for a total
of 2 off.
Sam was 1 off for 1, off 3 for 2, was 1 off for 3,
matched 4, and was 1 off for 5 for a total
of 6 off.
|
Scoring the Rubric |
|
|
Part A |
|
|
1 point |
All correct possibilities
written in fraction form |
|
Part B |
|
|
2 points |
All entries correct and written
in fraction form |
|
1 point |
At least 8 entries correct and written in fraction form |
|
Part C |
|
|
3 points |
The explanation demonstrates why Jill won and all parts are correct. Must include some discussion of probability. Translating
errors from Parts A and Part B, if
used correctly in the explanation, can still receive full credit. |
|
2 points |
Jill
is declared winner. Explanation is attempted but incomplete. For example, no
comparison between Jill and Sam is made. Translating
errors from Parts A and B, if used correctly in explanation can still receive
full credit. |
|
1 point |
Jill is declared winner. Faulty
or no explanation. |
|
Rubric |
|
|
5 - Advanced
Understanding, Excellent |
|
|
|
·
Attains all 6 points |
|
4 - Satisfactory
Understanding |
|
|
|
·
Attains 5 points |
|
3 - Almost Satisfactory Understanding |
|
|
|
·
Attains 4 points |
|
2 - Partial Understanding |
|
|
|
·
Attains 3 points |
|
1 - Minimal Understanding |
|
|
|
·
Attains 1 or 2 points |
|
0 - Incorrect |
|
|
|
·
Attains 0 points |
Home
Forums
Grades Pre K-2
Grades 3-5
Grades
6-8 Grades 9-12