In Windows (and perhaps in other operating systems), if the
video capture software can not keep up with the incoming video data
stream, it inserts a duplicate of the previous frame rather than leave
a "hole" in the movie. If you see this in a movie you are analyzing,
it's best to just skip that frame and move on to the next frame in
which you see that the object you are observing has really moved.
Probably not! Much of the video we watch is "interlaced." This means
that each full image ("frame") is made up of two exposures ("fields")
separated in time by 1/60 second. These two exposures are "interlaced"
so that together they look like a double-exposed photograph. You can
fix this in a video editor (such as QuickTime Pro) by choosing "single
field" and then "exporting" the resulting movie as a new file.
With older video cameras, as well as with webcams and movies from
still cameras, a single calibration using an object of known length in any orientation in the plane of the
motion gave correct lengths for both horizontal and vertical
motion.
Unfortunately, Digital Video (DV) cameras produce images on your
computer
that are stretched horizontally by about 12%. The images they produce
are 480 pixels high by 720 pixels wide. On a computer screen, these
images render a circle as an ellipse that is about 12% wider than it is
high. To fix this problem, you need to compress (not crop!) the
original movie from 480x720 to about 480x640 (or sometimes a slightly
different value such as 480x660). You can do this in a video editor
(such as QuickTime Pro) by resizing the movie either by dragging the
movie-frame handle to the desired size or by typing in the new size
when you "export" your edited movie as a new file. For critical data
you will need to calibrate your camera by photographing two such meter
sticks to determine whether you need to rescale to 640, 660, or some
slightly different value.
For many pedagogical exercises you can (and
should!) just ignore this correction.
Sony, Canon, Apple, and Redlake don't send me checks! But I am a co-author of VideoPoint and I do software testing for Lenox and for Vernier. I describe how to use these products because they are the ones I am most familiar with and because I believe they are the best available for teaching physics to our students. As other similar products become widely available for commonly used lab computer systems, I'd be glad to add them to this website.