Sociology 211
Social Problems
Presession 2002
Dr. Scott SchafferWeek 1 Discussion Questions: Social Problems and Social Solutions, chs. 1-14
1. Define the following terms as they are used by their authors. Be sure to identify which author discusses which term:
Social problem
Sociological problem
Globalization
Homogenization
Cultural diversity
Thomas Theorem
Ethnocentrism
Push factors vs. pull factors
Commodity consciousness
Dominant model of development
Relative deprivation
Imperialism and Neoimperialism
Underdevelopment
Inequality
Differential group membership
Poverty
2. Each of the articles in Parts I and II outlines a different aspect of a particular social problem: for Part I, globalization; for Part II, varying forms of inequality. Outline the ways in which each author discusses their angle on each of these social problems. Then, show the kind of sociological problem each author is referring to, as well as how you might be able to draw connections between the manifestation of this sociological problem discussed by the author and a parallel kind of sociological problem in your social world.
3. The different phenomena analyzed in this weeks readings (globalization and inequality) have their roots in and are experienced at all three levels of analysis (macro, meso, and micro). Outline how each of the articles shows the ways in which these two phenomena occur at each of the levels of analysis. Then, show the ways in which you think they would be experienced at each level of analysis. What kinds of similarities or differences do you see between these two ways of understanding social phenomena? Why do you think these similarities/differences occur?
4. One of the key issues in this course is understanding the ways in which we participate in the reproduction or subversion of different kinds of social and sociological problems. Outline your experience of the social problems discussed this week (globalization and inequality), as well as the ways in which you participate in reproducing or subverting these phenomena. To what extent do you think that you participate in the reproduction of these phenomena? In their subversion?